Comments for Jdeuel's Blog http://www.fatkitties.com Learning Unity One Chapter at a Time. Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:18:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 Comment on Chapter 9: Game Complete. by jdeuel http://www.fatkitties.com/2010/12/chapter-9-game-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-23 jdeuel Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:18:35 +0000 http://jdeuel.fatkitties.net/?p=182#comment-23 (Only if you clear your cache!) (Only if you clear your cache!)

]]> Comment on Chapter 9: Game Complete. by jdeuel http://www.fatkitties.com/2010/12/chapter-9-game-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-22 jdeuel Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:10:10 +0000 http://jdeuel.fatkitties.net/?p=182#comment-22 Fix'd it though. Fix’d it though.

]]> Comment on Chapter 9: Game Complete. by jdeuel http://www.fatkitties.com/2010/12/chapter-9-game-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-21 jdeuel Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:04:47 +0000 http://jdeuel.fatkitties.net/?p=182#comment-21 Yeah, well I put the 4 outside of the house as a method of debugging the fire. Also, if you get all 5 the battery container appears empty, but still works on the door. Yeah, well I put the 4 outside of the house as a method of debugging the fire. Also, if you get all 5 the battery container appears empty, but still works on the door.

]]> Comment on Chapter 9: Game Complete. by Erik Hogan http://www.fatkitties.com/2010/12/chapter-9-game-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-20 Erik Hogan Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:42:29 +0000 http://jdeuel.fatkitties.net/?p=182#comment-20 Good going mate. Just one bug I have spotted - You don't need to knock over the targets at all, just grabbing the batteries outside of the hut is enough to win the game. Good going mate.

Just one bug I have spotted – You don’t need to knock over the targets at all, just grabbing the batteries outside of the hut is enough to win the game.

]]> Comment on Comments are now open to the public. by David http://www.fatkitties.com/2010/12/comments-are-now-open-to-the-public/comment-page-1/#comment-11 David Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:07:45 +0000 http://jdeuel.fatkitties.net/?p=166#comment-11 Balls. Balls.

]]> Comment on Chapter 4 (part 2 of 2) by jdeuel http://www.fatkitties.com/2010/11/chapter-4-part-2-of-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8 jdeuel Sun, 05 Dec 2010 02:01:34 +0000 http://jdeuel.fatkitties.net/?p=144#comment-8 True, but we're using a capsule collider and unity mostly generates straight up Mesh Colliders, without bothering to lower their detail first. True, but we’re using a capsule collider and unity mostly generates straight up Mesh Colliders, without bothering to lower their detail first.

]]> Comment on Chapter 4 (part 2 of 2) by earok http://www.fatkitties.com/2010/11/chapter-4-part-2-of-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7 earok Tue, 30 Nov 2010 04:15:53 +0000 http://jdeuel.fatkitties.net/?p=144#comment-7 IMO, there shouldn't be a noticeable amount of difference between the CPU power needed to calculate a raycast hit and a collision if you're doing a sphere-to-polygon collision. Both work on basically the same mechanic, testing if a ray intersects any polygon on a mesh, the primary difference with a collision is that the ray is based on the velocity vector of the sphere. That said, the most computationally efficient way would actually be measuring the distance between the player and the door, and opening it automatically if the player is close. IMO, there shouldn’t be a noticeable amount of difference between the CPU power needed to calculate a raycast hit and a collision if you’re doing a sphere-to-polygon collision. Both work on basically the same mechanic, testing if a ray intersects any polygon on a mesh, the primary difference with a collision is that the ray is based on the velocity vector of the sphere.

That said, the most computationally efficient way would actually be measuring the distance between the player and the door, and opening it automatically if the player is close.

]]>